| vivster said: Damn, now a want a big Monitor. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/big-format-gaming-displays/ 65" is a bit overkill but 40-50" would be pretty neat. |
I could go a 50" at most probably. I am at 32" now and gotten used to it.
You do have monitors like the Phillips 436M6VBPAB... Which is 43", IPS, Freesync, 4k, HDR.
Just a shame it's only 60hz.
| HoloDust said: 32:9 monitors really have my attention: |
The frustrating part about such aspect ratios is... Content.
I was running 48:9 aspects years ago and for anything outside of select games, it was a pain.
Of course you also have the screen space to do multiple things at once if that is your cup of tea.
| HoloDust said: Hm, you're quite right. I checked specs of both that Samsung's 49" 32:9 and regular 27" 16:9, and they're about the same in height. Well, only thing I can say is that I'm sure glad I was wrong - while I don't mind "only" 2x24", 2x27" is even better. Probably there's some genre's that it's not that useful, but any FPP/TPP game (which makes up for quite a bit of my gaming diet) benefits from it, at least from my POV (pun intended). |
Fisheye becomes a big issue in allot of games... The best game I have found for such aspect ratios is actually... Civilization.
Forget anything that Blizzard makes, they tend to only beat the 16:9 drums.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
