By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
quickrick said:

I understand what you are saying i'll be more accurate hitting the submit button since people that imo have a agenda use as fuel against me, but is that called lying? like the above poster claims, no i assumed something that i thought i was true with out being 100%, sure its wrong, but some are making it bigger then it is. i'm gonna focus on fixing that i will post something and make sure its accurate, before assuming.

It may not necessarily be lying, but it can cause problems if you say someone did/said something that you aren't entirely sure of. And the biggest issues you'll face on the site are history and patterns. People are less forgiving when they see your name pop up, because they'll think 'oh great, it's quickrick/cliffman/troll' or what have you. I am not personally bothered by you misremembering my words, but I can understand why it would bother others. 

Coming back to the root of this discussion — moderation. The mod team receives lots of flack for letting what I noted above slide without a second look. Do not take this as me trying to call you out, I'm merely stating where my hands get tied. Sure, I don't always agree with every complaint/piece of feedback, but you need to put yourself in my position for a second. *This is just an example* · I step in and moderate Rol, right? He attacked/flamed you. Sure. Fine and dandy. Perhaps he went too far, calling you some name. Now, how does it look when I hear from others similar complaints of the trap to which Rol fell prey to? Was it really just him after all? Should everyone else see moderations while you continue hopping from thread-to-thread with bear traps ready to be deployed?

I just want you to think what I'm saying. 

I agree with you, and understand you have a job and ill be more careful. honestly wish every mod was fair and neutral like you, and pemalite.

Last edited by quickrick - on 06 December 2018