Pemalite said:
Mummelmann said:
DICE, and EA by extension, desperately need some new PR consultants. For people who claim to combat marginalization, they seem awfully keen on marginalizing their own customer base. The age old technique of sweeping legitimate complaints and criticism behind troll comments and vitriolic stupidity stopped working a long time ago, their chance to rise above and focus on presenting and selling an actual, desirable entertainment product seems to have passed.
It's a shame, I've really enjoyed the BF series up until BF1, I spent countless hours at LAN meetings playing BF2, and BF 3 and 4 were among only a handful of titles I ever bothered playing online. |
I even enjoyed Battlefield 1. Until I didn't.
The singleplayer was decent enough though. *stares at black ops 3*
|
Campaign was decent in BF1, but way too short for me, the value in previous BF titles was always the outstanding multiplayer. Even BF4's campaign was pretty good, but much too short as well. The BF1 multiplayer just didn't click for me, felt too fast-paced and enclosed, more like a CoD game in many ways. What I enjoyed in BF 3 and 4 was the strategy element of having 4 man squads capturing objectives (I only ever play conquest). To me, it seems like DICE have changed their formula more towards CoD in later installments, which is dumb since the people who buy and play BF are often the ones who don't want CoD, for a number of reasons.
