flashfire926 said:
Well I guess that explains the differences, I guess. I was merely only born at the start of the 6th gen, so I much less gaming experience when compared to others. Well then, looks like 50 serves as fair middle ground. |
Last year I thought I was in your position on not playing enough games. I eventually found out that 50 was not enough. I just realized that I only need to play 50 games to qualify. At 17 I definitely would have enough to make a top 50. Granted some of the lower games would be incredibly obscure but hey who doesn't have that one obscure game that they love?