Should Brett Kavanaugh SCOTUS Nomination Continue?

[irstupid]

Machiavellian said:

Aura7541 said:

See, that is an actual and completely valid issue I have with Kavanaugh. His stance on surveillance and the 4th Amendment is something I strongly disagree with. However, what did the Democrats, protesters, and media focus on? The sexual assault allegations and how Kavanaugh was "too emotional" during his hearing.

Would it have mattered.  You have no vote and those things would not have made any difference in the outcome anyway.  Actually the Dems tried to get a lot of documents and papers into the hearings but was nix by the GOP.  In other words, there was really nothing stopping Kavanaugh from getting appointed so you really could have saved your time by focusing on something else.

Wans' thtere more documents and papers showing Kavanaugh's court history than every other SC person in history combined. Like in the hundreds of thousands?

Who's idea was that? Was is the democrats that there needed to be so many? 

Funny if so, cause I hear them complain about two things in that regards.

1. There are too many pages/papers/cases to go through. (Ha, Repubs should tell them what they were told when AIA was voted on. You can read it after you vote yes)

2. We dont' know enough about Kav to vote (So you have too much info to read it all, so your ignorant? Ignorant by having to much research to do? That's it?)