| Heavenly_King said: I just find really suspicious that just now she is reporting the rape, instead of doing it 36 years ago. Why now?? maybe because he is nominated as supremem, the "anti Trump people with power" just want to stop this from happening. Also, even in the extreme case that the rape indeed occur, you can not prove it actually occurred 36 years after the event happened. |
Regardless of her motives in bringing it up now, I suspect the reason she didn't report it at the time was because back then, the vast majority of rape cases boiled down to nothing more than one person's word against another, with convictions generally only occurring in instances where the rapist was either dumb enough to carry out the attack in a place where they could be easily caught, or had enough of a conscience to confess to the crime. Hence, a lot of rape victims never reported what happened to them. It was only in the mid-late 90s that being able to prove an attack via DNA evidence and the like really became a widespread thing.
