By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 20 September 2018
Edit Thread
BraLoD said:
mjk45 said:

I have the same opinion, being this close to a new gen it seems logical to start with a clean slate much better PR to be seen as a feature of a new product rather than a  feature carried over from the back end of the previous gen  if there's to be any action PS5 is the place to look at.

The chances including it as a feature for PS5 launch will make someone decide to buy it or not is very, very small.

IMO we have more chances if Sony does it now and carries it over to the PS5, by an unified store.

People wanting to get the new system to play the new hot stuff can't care less if it has PS1 games on it or not to make that decision.

Sony will benefit nothing from waiting.

So if releasing a feature on their new gen won't make any difference in sales why would they take the money to make it in current gen? Just to please you and a handful of gamers? Since PS3 we already know that the BC was lightly used.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."