By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
vivster said:

Once humans start categorizing things, subcategories are inevitable. So the issue starts with having a categorization at all. Having 2 or 2000 doesn't make a difference since they're all useless and destructive.

Not necessarily. It's not because something is a cultural construct that it is bad. Any gender theory that takes note of the fact that we have only two sexes is probably closer to how we as humans operate naturally that one that divorces the concepts of sex and gender. That's why I'm an advocate of two fluid gender categories based on sex instead of two thousand ridgid gender identities with very little sociological foundation.

Well, let's see.

Genders got us inequality, bullying, suicide, wars, crazy trans people and now this. Nope, seems very much destructive. You know how much money, space and work we'd save if it wasn't for gender separation? It's not destructive because it's cultural, it is because it's stupid. The term "woman" as a gender as just as little bearing as "non-binary".

Look at our society right now. We're inventing categories, then separate ourselves and then demand inclusion. The fuck is that.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.