By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
massimus said:
JRPGfan said:

You do understand that alot of people are makeing less than they need to survive right?

"or dont spend more than you earn"

Sounds easy right? but what if you cant find any place cheaper to live? or spend less on food?
Should they become homeless? and just stop eating?

Like thats what its like for the poorest, they have no choice but to live off loans, as these studies suggest.
But rather than help the poor, lets give tax breaks to the top 1% richest in the country right? or spend $700 bn on military?

Everyone lives off of loans lol. I didn’t have cash to pay for my house or car. My financing is manageable. I don’t buy shit I can’t afford. 

It's curious to see american talking about the minimum someone needs to live.

Like the person needs to live in a expensive city, have big TV and relatively new car, etc.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."