By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:

Theory of relativity  also wasn't prove false at the time, so the 1B people saying it was wrong also weren't right. The point is amount of people that agree with a point doesn't make it right, that is a phallacy, but seems like you don't know them very well since you don't recognize your own use.

Not being able to ramp a production from 1M to 3M on launch and return to 1M after doesn't mean production problems, they were steadily producing the contracted amount and delivering. The problem of stock they had were solely due to demand outpacing supply, something that have happened to about any successful HW in history and never claimed as production issues just stock issue. But for your perfect logic it must not make sense. Having more value to most doesn't make it a rule that objectively a product have more value than another, it just means that at a determined price one product is found by the customer to have more value... unless you think 2018 Hip Hop is more valuable than Mozart because it sells more. Or in fact that all games that sold more than Octopath are more valuable (even more since they cost the same) CoD, Fifa, sold much much more, are they more valuable?

I shall also give you a hint, if 2 words ment exactly the same you wouldn't need both. So production and stock aren't the same and even if they are related a problem in one isn't a direct proof of problem in another. If Sony had a issue on production and let's say that for 1 month (or even 1 week) they weren't able to produce the planned they would have a problem on production, now if they kept steady production but there was more demand they don't have a problem in production. You used another phallacy of cause and consequence.

Do you even read your own answer? Alara is saying that content among others is why he thinks the game is worth 60. Let me copy your quote for you.

Again no people have listed content as one reason out of many you have not at any point given a well thought out explanation 

So you are the one that said no one listed it as one among other reason, and then are saying a lot have done... and accuse me of flip flopping.

 


You still don't understand how broken your argument is, Einstein put forward a theory which needed to be proven here people aren't putting forward a theory they're pointing out to you what is already concrete and backed up that's why it's not a fallacy on my end because the arguments have objective factors that are being highlighted.

You stil haven't understand what is the phallacy. The number of people that believe in something doesn't make a point more or less valid.

Here you've admitted stock problems were present end of that part of the argument everything else you've said is more fallacious waffle as you've admitted I'm right.

You really are something.

Part of Alara's post:

"My point is, this game is long. It has a lot of content. The writing is leagues better than most stuff in gaming, the stories and characters are compelling, the world is massive, and there's SO much to do and so many branching paths that it's worth every second. If you're the kind of person who thinks that having 16-bit inspired graphics somehow makes a game less valuable (then backpedaling to complain about 'archaic' game design like turn based combat and random encounters when it's shown how flimsy the graphics > gameplay argument is), then you're exactly the kind of person this game wasn't made for. "

Here the user highlights content, writing, story, game world, depth and references the game's quality and gameplay, so again we can confirm what you're posting on the front that people are only saying content is BS as the user has listed content as one of several reasons here only way you can see it any other way is if the is a language barrier why you say the isn't so we can discern you're deliberately trying to cherry pick parts of posts to continue your circus act here after all you tried bringing sales into it.

You really haven't read your own post.

I'm done with you. Go stuff your chest and boast of how much you won with your incredible logic and that I was shivering all the way home



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."