Pemalite said:
massimus said:
Logical fallacies? How are they separate? Rape has a basic definition too. In a human context it means something different. It’s not “rape” in the animal kingdom just as it’s not “homosexuality” because of a few anomalies. That’s just my opinion.
|
How are they separate? First, hows about you try thinking about how are they even the same?
thismeintiel said:
You can't really just respond with "logical fallacy" and think you won the argument. He makes a good point. There is little reason to compare us to the animal kingdom. We have different thought processes and most animals really have no morals, only survival instincts. |
For Christ sake. This angle is silly.
I just showed examples where animals were in a MONOGAMOUS RELATIONSHIP. AKA. NO Rape whatsoever.
thismeintiel said:
You can't really just respond with "logical fallacy" and think you won the argument. He makes a good point. There is little reason to compare us to the animal kingdom. We have different thought processes and most animals really have no morals, only survival instincts. |
You bet your ass I can and have. There is a reason why logical fallacies exist and why someone looses an argument when they use them.
|
Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacy of analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false.
Trying to use "it's a fallacy" to dismiss other people's points or win in a argument easily turns into snake eating it's own tail. 😹
If you're not bothering to break down why someone's logic or argument is unsound while you're using "it's a fallacy", it's just noise.
