massimus said: Logical fallacies? How are they separate? Rape has a basic definition too. In a human context it means something different. It’s not “rape” in the animal kingdom just as it’s not “homosexuality” because of a few anomalies. That’s just my opinion. |
How are they separate? First, hows about you try thinking about how are they even the same?
thismeintiel said: You can't really just respond with "logical fallacy" and think you won the argument. He makes a good point. There is little reason to compare us to the animal kingdom. We have different thought processes and most animals really have no morals, only survival instincts. |
For Christ sake. This angle is silly.
I just showed examples where animals were in a MONOGAMOUS RELATIONSHIP. AKA. NO Rape whatsoever.
thismeintiel said: You can't really just respond with "logical fallacy" and think you won the argument. He makes a good point. There is little reason to compare us to the animal kingdom. We have different thought processes and most animals really have no morals, only survival instincts. |
You bet your ass I can and have. There is a reason why logical fallacies exist and why someone looses an argument when they use them.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--