RaptorChrist said:
They are all companies looking to make the most profit they possibly can. Any "pro-consumer" actions they take are still for their own long-term benefit, and they wouldn't be doing those things if they could get away with not doing them. We all love videogames and maybe it's good to sometimes tuck that thought away and believe that these companies are catering to us as gamers, but let's not kid ourselves. If you have ever worked for a for-profit company before then it becomes abundantly clear that every single thing they do is for money. No exaggeration. Hard stop. Heck, many of the people working for these companies don't even play videogames. And just because Sony, as a company, makes a decision to do something, doesn't mean that every employee of said company agrees with it. Sometimes it seems like people can spin any situation into a positive for themselves. If it were the other way around, Sony supporting crossplay and MS against it, I'd bet anything that your opinions would be different. Do you disagree? |
My opinion would be exactly the same. As you say companies purpose is to make money. My purpose is as a customer to make the purchase decision that is most advantageous to me.
Playstation lines up with those objectives more presently. Xbox has been so in the past aswell and SEGA before that.
This is very pragmatic. As it stands, Sony has nothing to gain from allowing cross play, just like Microsoft back in the 360 era when they refused to do so.