LivingMetal said:
First party, second party and exclusives have ALWAYS defined the image of console. Because no matter how powerful of a console you have, you cannot have those fore mentioned games on that console. And this whole "I just like third party games" to justify an Xbox One (not to say that there aren't other reasons that make the One worth the purchase) is a very sorry excuse. Easily, Sony's console (for example) offers exclusive titles that are also of the same genres as those third parties games. So you get more game, more choices. |
More choices are bad, because they make it harder to decide =p.
Give me the same games every year so I don't need to think about what I want to buy.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."