Angelus said:
That's like saying don't write a sci-fi story for the purpose of having a sci-fi story. If somebody wants to write a strong female (or whatever else) character, why shouldn't they? The only thing that matters is how well you execute that |
Perhaps you miss interpreted his phrase.
And it really goes to the same point, you don't write a sci-fi for the sake of being sci-fi, you want to write a great story and being sci-fi is just the theme, canvas, boundary, etc. Same you create a great char and if so happen you put as a female great.
But when you decide to make a sci-fi or strong female for the sake of it you'll fall in the pitfal of not great execution. That is one of the points discussed a lot in this thread that when for diversity sakes some movies or games define a woman they make her flaweless to not get complains from SJW and that ends up being shallow and boring.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."