Ok. From what I see for example about new games on E3 I see battlefield and tomb raider having a female character.. much less than male characters. But let's see what you get on E3 if is that extraordinary emphasis. In my view is too much exaggerated and a distraction for people to be divided. Bet let's see.
About patience, man if you are tolerating me I can stop. I'm just trying to discuss and it is interesting for me.. That is the reason for foruns to exist I believe.
Nope, not having to tolerate you. I think he was talking more on all the talks here with ad hominem, fallacies and other non-sense.
TR uses suspension of disbelief as does UC or CoD. But certain historical elements being disregarded is a problem.
Also on the forced diversity we have for example Thor with black and Asian asgardians.
We need more roles filled like how they filled Ripley's role in Alien:
Write a unisex role. If a love interest is necessary, make that love interest unisex as well. Fill the role with the best actor for the part (best pairing if a love interest is necessary), and that's it. Don't write a strong female for the purpose of having a strong female, because that character will likely suck.
Yep Ripley was an excellent and believable char
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"