By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
Maxosaurus-rex said:

Since you got me before the edit, someone's sources are not above criticism. 

We can most certainly criticize sources. - Especially if said sources lack citations for their various claims.

OK then, and in order for most of these posts to make sense is by having an incredibly bias source or intentionally obfuscating the facts (most likely from bias).

 

NK has been well covered for decades. We know their tactics and know their games. We know that there was at least a partial collapse of the test site.  We know the last explosion was on a massive scale. We know it created earthquakes following it. We know that it left the site with structural damage and only a matter of time before catastrophe occurs if not decommissioned. We know they dug another tunnel before announcing their intention to dismantle it. We know north korea has invited press to view their theatrics before. They could easily already have a second site. People are so blinded by their disdain for one man that they are actually accepting the NK propaganda as truth.