Pemalite said:
Maxosaurus-rex said:
If you notice, I'm the only one presenting sources instead of making baseless political rant posts
|
I am not saying you haven't. Just asking you not to delve into logical fallacies as that can and will erode your argument.
Maxosaurus-rex said:
You might want to look up the definition of ad hominem, bud. And turn a blind eye to the facts if you want. Doesn't mean they aren't there.
|
Ad Hominem is where you attack someones character, motive, or other attribute (I.E. Political stance) in order to undermine their position or evade the discussion, which is most certainly pertinent to you with some of your prior statements.
I tend to call people out on logical fallacies so that the discussion can move onto something more constructive.
Kaneman! said:
Nuclear demilitarization would need to be priority, no matter what the country's political stance towards the USA is.
|
I agree. But the world tends to be politically complex, which prevents such an ideal scenario from occurring.
I am actually hoping that Australia will go the Nuclear Power route at some point, but we seem to be Nuclearphobes.
|
Someone's sources =/= their character or individuality. And yes, sources are on the table for criticism of bias and credibility
