CrazyGamer2017 said:
No need to be sorry, your question is totally fair so here is my reply: I would never ask of 3DS sales to be discounted or ignored. If the thread had been 3DS vs Vita, 3DS totally crushing Vita in sales, then I would have been totally ok with that as a comparison of 3DS vs Vita is totally fair because they are direct competitors that are fighting for the exact same market: Portables. It's the fact the thread is pitching Switch + 3DS vs PS4 sales which seems wrong. As Louie said it himself, Vita figures are unknown. So comparing to unknown sales of a system seems kind of an unfair way to put forth figures. And this is just my opinion, you are of course free to disagree |
Thank you for the response.
Let me use a little bit of analogy to present my case a little bit better.
The user RolStoppable is the referee in a wrestilling match including both Sony and Nintendo. Sony is clearly the best during a solo hand to hand combat but Nintendo has the upper hand when combos are throw into the misture.
If this was a boxe match. Sony would win without much problems. The same with Nintendo in jiu-jitsu (or something like that, i don't watch this kind of sport! :P)
Would it be fair to exclude certain combos in the wrestiling match just because one of the competidors doesn't know how or is incapable to perform them?
