By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster said:
Pemalite said:

Except it doesn't. Try again.

You are trying to conflate two different issues which is a logical fallacy. Try again.

I'll play your game one last time. All you're saying is"baseless drivel".

You can't have it both ways. You can't refuse to articulate why you feel your sources support your claims and simply assert they answer the issues I have with it and then expect me to go through and display the intellectual rigor that you just opted out of. It doesn't work your way.
 
 I'm done with your nonsense.

K. Thanks. Bye.

A few misconceptions.
1) I can refuse anything, for any reason, whenever I desire.
2) My source doesn't contradict your claim or vice versa.
3) I am not expecting you to go through any "intellectual rigor". - The onus is on you to do it or not.

The fact is... The source that I presented is describing how skin pigmentation evolved due to geographical+UV influences, this isn't opinion, it's fact.
What you are trying to assert is how human populations disseminated across the globe. - Both can also occur at the same time, both can also be unrelated.

It's like some people who tries to assert that Evolution is trying to describe how life came to be, when it doesn't, that would be abiogenesis.

Now I ask you to go back to the start and try again or agree or move on.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--