Leadified said:
Yeah, we have social services because of the increasing demands of everyday life. But how you do it, whether it's private or government, doesn't really matter as long as it goes through the capitalist mode of production. Social services are provided by taxes, which come from people's wages from their jobs. Modern society is defined by capital accumulation and commodity production. Social democrats, a group of people who would agree with your definitions of socialism, like their social services by the government but also like the capitalist mode of production. But I don't, it's a weak definition. The Nazis liked this system and effectively wanted to transformed the country into one giant state corporation, it's your boss with some benefits as long as you remain loyal to the Nazi regime. The Soviet system was based around workplace participation and democracy but eroded away from the increasing authoritarianism from the Soviet central leadership, but had eliminated the capitalist mode of production. You see the difference? Authoritarianism is currently rising in the West as wealth becomes more concentrated in a few group of people and the government begins to serve their interests over everyone else. If the government acts in a way they don't like, they'll just move somewhere else and take everything with them, which is why governments are reluctant to act on radical policies. I mean I was expecting at least some John Locke or Adam Smith or Rousseau, this wasn't unexpected by still somehow disappointing. |
"The Nazis liked this system and effectively wanted to transformed the country into one giant state corporation"
so anyone in nazi germany could set up a business? you did just state that the nazi's liked the capitalist mode of production
and you haven't addressed my question, how did hitler guarantee jobs for everyone if the economy in germany was privitised?
"The Soviet system was based around workplace participation and democracy but eroded away from the increasing authoritarianism from the Soviet central leadership"
well obviously, a ten year old would know right away that you cannot keep people at an equal level unless their environment is authoritarian
"had eliminated the capitalist mode of production. You see the difference?"
well germany wasn't capitalist so...
and i'm sure that the millions of deaths, the famine, the complete fall off in terms of living standards etc etc etc was all worth it for those people once they were "equal"
because what really matters is equality not freedom to do whatever you want or being able to live comfortably
like what's happening in venezuela right now... at least the people there are equal right?
"I mean I was expecting at least some John Locke or Adam Smith or Rousseau, this wasn't unexpected by still somehow disappointing."
what wasn't unexpected?