Barkley said:
They may very well be, but if you'd like to give any evidence at all to back up your claim that'd be nice. So far your point has been that they look "ridiculously low" and that when Nintendo say 10m they probably mean 10.5m. Along with you not knowing the dates before spouting things out and then reaching for a figure for 5-6 weeks of data to prove 2 weeks of VGC data wrong, I'm probably not going to accept anything you say. Your posts have just been full of errors, check things before you post maybe. |
Maybe you have some stakes in these VGchartz numbers, but it shouldn't obstruct you from reality. We have real analysts that give much higher numbers than VGchartz, who are way too low compared to what Nintendo themselves announced.
