Twitter statement reveals why it won't ban Trump over his controversial tweets

[DonFerrari]

JWeinCom said:

DonFerrari said:

That wasn't my first post on this thread. And the "movement speaches" is something about random posters? Nope those are mouthpieces of some progressive movements.

By initial, I meant the first post I responded to.  And I've honestly never heard the term movement speeches, nor does a google or dictionary search yield any relevant usages, so I can't be expected to know what you mean by that. 

Ok for the initial, miss comunication.

You couldn't associate movement speeches with the major representatives of a movement speaking in the name of it? But ok. My bad if I was unprecise.

contestgamer said:

ArchangelMadzz said:

Way to put a spin on "You can't threaten violence on our platform"

Governments can legally engage in violence, individuals cant. Different standards, Trump represents a government.

That is indeed and sadly true. Government retain the monopoly over violence. And to the answer gave to you, Trump currently is the maximum representative of the govern, but surely Twitter isn't mandated to keep his account and allow him to break ToS because of it.