Twitter statement reveals why it won't ban Trump over his controversial tweets

[DonFerrari]

JWeinCom said:

DonFerrari said:

Where in "Yes let's silence all we disagree with. A very good policy. " I stated general random facebook posts?

Have I said they aren't allowed to do it? I know they are a private corporation, that is even why I said they are free to not follow or enforce their ToS, I just said I'm against this part of it, simple as that.

May be a question of the bubble we leave within in facebook. But on my account I see a lot of those getting banned and "reverse racism" and manhating getting props and no ban.

"It's quite common on Brazilian facebook accounts and movements speaches."

There.

That wasn't my first post on this thread. And the "movement speaches" is something about random posters? Nope those are mouthpieces of some progressive movements.

ArchangelMadzz said:

DonFerrari said: 

Have I said they aren't allowed to do it? I know they are a private corporation, that is even why I said they are free to not follow or enforce their ToS, I just said I'm against this part of it, simple as that.

May be a question of the bubble we leave within in facebook. But on my account I see a lot of those getting banned and "reverse racism" and manhating getting props and no ban.

I think it's a pretty good idea to have a rule against inciting hatred or violence against an individual for a social media company.

Well considering you spend your free time looking for people who aren't banned for certain things it's not odd that you'd pay more attention to those who aren't getting banned.

Well not going to discuss what the company have to do or not, they decide if they do and if we don't agree we don't go there.

Well it may be a case of looking at the subject or not, for sure. But since we do agree on the premisse that all should be threated equally under the ToS independent of their reasoning or alignment there isn't much for us to discuss =]