DonFerrari said:
It's better to leave it to each dev, if you force things not only you can make the relationship bad but you may also make they checkbox on some features that may make the final product worst than what they would do with freedom. Because for one game 4k60fps may be better than complexity and size of map, for another dropping to 30fps will allow better IQ, etc. So having a game that only needs 30fps having to put 60fps for example would compromise other aspects of the game that were more important. |
Well based on the games that's coming out on both PS4 Pro vs X1x... When the devs have this so called freedom, guess what they are doing with it? Nothing... Guess what they did with the x1x version? Enhance it...
Leaving it up to devs sounds great on paper but after a full year of lead with the Ps4 Pro, the results speak for themselves... Rarely did we ever see the Devs enhance the games for the Ps4 Pro apart from just the basic higher rendering resolution... 1080p mode on most games on the pro were almost exactly the same as on the ps4 which to me, buying a mid-cycle refresh for a better experience, is nonsense.
And sure, there could be some negative effects in developer relations but I highly doubt it will effect anything. I mean heck, they only really enhanced the witcher 3 after the x1x came out so I doubt it has any negative affect tbh. But if it does the trade off is worth it imo cause the consumers who buy it get a much better experience.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850