By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Green098 said:
DonFerrari said:

So a leaker said Sony paid to remove the game from Switch but Sony couldn't be bothered to request full exclusivity? Seems legit.

Paying for port sure exist, but you are just making air.

It's a PS4 exclusive in Japan and I think if the leaker got Monster World right along with Sony paying them to not port it to a nintendo platform, I don't think it means nothing. They even mentioned Sony didn't care if it came to Xbox One/PC. They also predicted a Monster Hunter XX port for Switch.

http://gearnuke.com/ps4-get-exclusive-monster-hunter-5-capcom-rumor/

While I can't say it's definitely real, just that it certainly has something to it. It also mentions some sort of Monster Hunter Portable 5 from the main monster hunter team coming to Switch at some point after Capcom got cold feet about skipping out on and risking their Japanese audience. So if it does come true maybe Capcom are smarter than we think.

There are a plethora of games that are exclusive to PS4 in Japan that get Xbox version WW that Sony didn't pay a dime. And in this case the game is Japan PS4 exclusive and WW will go to X1 and PC so that is hardly a certainty that Sony paid for it.

We all know Switch is a lot weaker than the other platforms so that can be the sole reason for it not being on it. Not to forget game developing starts a long time before reveals, so it could be decided as exclusive even before Switch anouncement or even release.

And sure the leaker may be right, or he may have just heard something on the announcement from off-hands and fabricated a leaking to his taste, do we have the guy history as a leaker? Because we also have several leakers that invent everything, and then erase the wrong leaks.

OTBWY said:
DonFerrari said:

It isn't out of realm of reality.

It's just that you affirmed with conviction so I'm asking for evidence, because blocking only nintendo and paying for it doesn't make sense.

I think user Green098 already gave the appropriate answer.

Yes, he gave. Something you haven't had and that your initial post was very far from.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."