By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
KLAMarine said:

With no regard to how their activities might impact the environment? Not that it mattered then as much as it does now: the US today hosts hundreds of millions of people, many more than what I figure there was before the 1770s.

Proportionally the number of people with intentions to hunt and fish are smaller than they were then, and the available land is much greater. This is what the United States looked like in 1790. 

Yes and according to http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h986.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1790_United_States_Census , the population in 1790 was a little under four million. Today it's over 300 million and population density has only climbed despite the growth of the US's surface area which stopped after Hawaii joined our Union in 1959.

With that in mind, you state "Proportionally the number of people with intentions to hunt and fish are smaller than they were then" and I must ask for raw numbers. 100% of 1790's US population is a little under four million, obviously. 1% of today's population is very close to 1790's 100% and 2% of today's exceeds 1790's total population.

sc94597 said:

This is where the federal government claims land. 

That's a lot of white space.