Ganoncrotch said:
what I can see out of my right eye... if I only open that and focus (my brain just takes the image away when both are open so that I can actually see a clear image) is actually a giant Lightning bolt shaped black scar with a tiny amount of peripheral vision around it (just some black and white rods, no cones) so I get free Harry Potter Scar Vision if I need it! |
Uhnnn nice. So you already are almost up there =]
Ka-pi96 said:
More than that, couldn't that be seriously dangerous? I assume no sense of touch would also mean no pain. So if you cut yourself on anything you wouldn't feel it and realise so instead you'd just keep walking around bleeding, until you eventually die from blood loss and you're like "shit, where did that cut come from?". |
Yes it's quite dangerous to live without touch... but actually total impairment on sight, hearing, touch and smell can be quite dangerous... but we can avoid danger with some adaptation, but I have no idea how much sex would lose on being touchless.
JEMC said:
Not just that, but also suffering burns from catching burning things without noticing, for example. There's an illness called CIPA that does that, and has a lot of drawbacks like not sweating, meaning that you can't regulate your body temperature.
*Leaves the PC, still angry at the idea of spending money* |
Right you are, several harsh accidents caused by this disease.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."