By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bandorr said:
NanakiXI said:

You're really bashful aren't you? Let me ask you this. Is your opinion so great because your frequency of posting on an Internet forum for video games exceeds his? If it bothers you so much, shouldn't you just ignore it?

Also same could be said for your obviously "junior high level" response. Really didn't want to go there, but the whole kettle calling the pot black thing bothers me.

You are connecting two thought that go together like oil and water. My opinion is not based on my amount of posts. It is the rarity of the thread creation,  not the posts themselves.

My question is the logic of this thread in the first place. Why would someone that post so rarely, and who hasn't created a thread in 4 years - choose a mostly video game website to discuss this?

What about this topic is special enough to warrant creating a thread after 4 years?

He could have 20,000,000 post and I would ask the exact same question.

And if someone is going to try and play semantics with "I didnt say I am left or right" I'm going to point out the glaring points.

All I'm going to say is this. You mentioned his post count originally, not I. You mentioned two things and I chose one of the two as a reference point for this reply. It's not so much as oil and water, as it's peanut butter and peanut spread. Although I do see your point on the semantics, after reading a couple of other threads he has replied in. Although I don't view his responses as necessarily having negative intentions.



FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."