By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
roadkillers said:
Nautilus said:

The gameplay was.Actually, the gameplay was excellent.And thats about it.Messy story, and an even big offender, unfinished story(I dont know whos to blame though, Konami or Kojima, thats why I give him the benefit of the doubt)Very few inside space(as in bases) limiting the gameplay basically only to open spaces, which is a shame.Snake is kinda meh due to him having a very basic personality due to almost no lines to talk.I could go on, but I think you got the idea.

 

Its still a good game, it just dosent hold a candle to the past entries or Kojima work, really.

It makes me wonder, if this whole Konami thing didn't go viral would the complaints be anywhere as loud. I think the game is a solid 9/10 if not higher. Compared to other MGS, that's a different story because they are all so good.

My personal take on MGS V has nothing to do with Konami.I mean, other than the fact that it could have given more time or more creative freedom to create it(in the sense that it shouldnt have made all those bullshit decisions about separating the team in different rooms and all).Thats my take on the game and only the game.

I really feel like that, comparing to the pedigree that MGS has, and Kojima himself has, it left much to be desired.But Im happy that you enjoyed more than I did.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1