BraLoD said:
It actually means USA people will pay for it, twice, because they will pay for the actual building of the wall, and now for overpriced goods. USA only loses with that. |
Hmm, you realize that the proposed tariff or import taxes on Mexican goods (based off last year's exports alone) would pay for the estimated cost of two walls across the entire border? Estimated costs are $15-25 billion and the proposed tax is 22% with $236 billion exported into the US in 2015.
And those "expensive" alternatives are either from the US or from other Central and South American countries. When one of your largest trade partners has a fairly substantive trade deficit in their favor, it's not uncommon for politicians to try to balance it out. When you have the leverage in trade situations, you don't concede. :-/
Edit: Ofc, we could truly hard-nosed and eliminate all foreign aid to Mexico and use that to pay for it. The United States gave away $419m in foreign aid to Mexico in 2013.