By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
thomvrell on 14 January 2017
Edit Thread
ICStats said:
thomvrell said:

Those are a dozen or so articles out of likely thousands on the Switch that can be found online. You can't expect anyone to take your tiny (self-selected) sample size or the fact that no one here has non-bias and come to a reasonable consclusion. I mean seriously, I've told you where to look on Youtube for example - the comments, like-dislike ratios, and views and yet you're still replying with "I find so and so are mixed, mostly negative, out of the 13 I searched for myself, and also because I personally didn't enjoy the presentation". Do the like-dislike ratios not count as hard evidence? Inb4 millions of people are called delusional "Nintendo fans".

Not at all selected dude.  That list was top results from Googling "nintendo switch opinion" articles for the last week.

https://www.google.com/#tbs=qdr:w&q=nintendo+switch+opinion&tbm=nws

Being ingornat to facts is going to just lead to disappointment.

Hmm odd, my own google search showed much different results. You should know that 1. Google's algorithm isn't known very well by most people. 2. It doesn't show a representative sample size in searches. 3. Google likes to cater certain websites and products based on the user's searches, even if you aren't logged in. 4. The sample size is still WAY too small, and this should be the obvious one. I'm not ignorant to the general consensus, which Youtube and Facebook represent, and not VGChartz unfortunately. I also focused more on numbers rather than your approach, which seems to involve websites that are known for publishiing articles that are clickbait or at the very least incite a reaction.