By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
KrspaceT said:

And you know it can't run it, how?

And do you have any guarantees that it can run on the Switch ? 

The CPU in the Switch is more than 2x slower and the GPU is 10x slower than what's found in the PS4 and KH3 is probably targetting 30FPS much like the older games so cutting the framerate to 20FPS on the Switch won't do it ... 

Your only hope that the Switch will get KH3 is if the PS4 version is targetting a much higher performance profile like say 1080p@60fps while the Switch will be running at a sub-HD resolution with 20FPS ... 

I can even imagine a scenario in which the Switch will get a cell shaded treatment instead of the original artistic vision of the HD twins ...

The 'do you have a guarantee' bit isn't the best way to argue. 

Also let's not forget we do not have any information from the actual people about what the game is playing. All we can know for sure, based on the difference in performance between U Breath and Switch Breath seen so far, is that it is stronger than the U.

I am not suggesting that the Switch will outpace them, but I am not going to pretend that it cannot reach similar levels. 

According to the online stats on the X1, the system has 8 Gbs of RAM, 768 shaders 854 MHZ AMD cards, and 1.31 terraflops, to the Wii U's 2 GBS RAM, 320 shaders, .352 terraflops and 550 MHZ.

Given that the 1 terraflop rumor covers a sizeable gap of performance (assuming that it is just 1 terraflop, I am not a huge power focuser), getting within the ballpark is rather likely. 

Especially if you note that they've had several years to find a way to advance that far. 



The Democratic Nintendo fan....is that a paradox? I'm fond of one of the more conservative companies in the industry, but I vote Liberally and view myself that way 90% of the time?