| UnderstatedCornHole said: They don't "know" anything. They simply understand what the results of a certain test means in the narrow context of the biased direction they've been asked to test in. A few of the ignorant vocal ones will go for 15 minutes of fame. They puppet exactly what "other people say". They don't realize they are in an echo chamber. They are no more intellectual than hollywood celebs who are surrounded by more useful idiots like themselves. The worst thing about "scienties" is that they forget they are irrantional emotionally and fall back on science to prove to themselves they aren't muppets. Their data is extrapolated by ill people who serve to manipulate the masses and thus we have "climate change". Real issues don't even get dealt with in politics, do you think something might not be real is going to be looked seriously? Don't be so naive. It's just something for the liberals to worship and feel good about themselves and make them more pliable. |
All I can ascertain is that you believe that the majority of the entire planets scientisits and scientific organizations are colluding together in some sort of conspiracy theory to fabricate "Climate Change". - They aren't. They have real science that you can look at and verify and in some cases, repeat yourself.
Unless you have evidence that this conspiracy theory you are peddling is factual, then you really have no basis to stand on, I and any other logical-thinking person will believe the majority of scientists that climate change is real, it's the scientisits job to get educated, find cause and effect and extrapolate. - They have done so and you should stand by their findings, not a politicians.
| Locknuts said: I hope Trump launches a huge investigation into climate change and we find out the truth. We know that he is a skeptic and has brought in a lot of right wing people, so if they use all their arguments and still deem climate change a big issue, then you know that shit is a serious problem. |
We have had decades worth of debate. It was an issue in the 90's. It is an issue today, if we spend the next several decades continuing to debate, then nothing will get done and we will continue to do more damage to the planet.
Remember, the majority of the planets scientists stand behind the findings that climate change is happening. It's their job to know, the politicians are not scientists, they need to shut up and stand behind what scientists find.
Converesly, scientists haven't actually stopped making experiments for decades, recording data, taking samples... And they still point to increases to Carbon and thus Climate change. It is simply irrefutable.
All the climate data next year will still point to climate change. Same with the year after that.
Trumps issue is... He follows garbage "news" like infowars that peddles conspiracy theories without any factual basis. That is dangerous and stupid.
Pauline Hanson and One Nation here in Australia is just as bad, Malcolm Roberts is a Climate-Change Denier, he had a Physicist literally throw evidence of climate change at him, he had Australia's national chief science officer school him... And he still deny's climate change.
Sadly he did get elected, even if it was only 77 first preference votes. - He has a history of working and running coal mines, he has an ulterior motive to bolster his own financial interests in the coal industry, sadly Pauline Hanson supports the moron.
They even went to the Great Barrier Reef to "Prove" that Coral bleaching isn't happening. - Not only were they in a part of the Reef that is the least damaged... But it was bleached a long time ago.
Coral can actually rejuvinate over time after a bleaching event, given some time and the right circumstance, but if it gets bleached to many times in quick succession, it will not recover, sadly they were ignorant about that particular tidbit.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
