SpokenTruth said:
I think I might know the case of the girl that was removed. Rachel Dolezal and she was removed from her position because she achieved a position of power and authority through lies and deciet. That's not the make up of a good leader. She wasn't removed because she was white. There are many white people that serve as leaders within the NAACP. As for being accepted into the NAACP, you don't have to be black at all. That's never been required. Anybody can join. |
I didn't say she was removed because she was white, I said that was because she pretended to be black (but when someone says he/she fells of another gender it must be accepted) but the guy that was white skinned was accepted as being black because he had one ancestor so don't twist it.
ArchangelMadzz said:
If SJW's claim that what happens to gay's and different races in other countries happen in the west then they are wrong. But If you notice SJW's aren't usually minorities. Minorities themselves just want equal rights and to be treated like everyone else. That's why pride parades are a thing. |
SJW's and several minorities leaders claim of systematic killing, persecution, etc that only really happens in other countries. There were several instances of crime commited against black, woman, gay, etc that were portrayed as because of color, gender or sexual orientation but were in fact only crimes against a person, but got coverage because someone wanted to pass the message.
And you basically are avoiding the point I made. That was very precise, the only reason they are able to protest is because the bigger issues doesn't exist anymore so now they are looking at minor things or in some cases fabricated ones.
Thisguywhokills said: melbye said: The muslims are held responsible for every action done by one of them so with that logic you share the blame for what others (white people) had done |
The problem is when you look closer (and have been muslims showing it) a too big portion of muslim accept or support the actions of the terrorists.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."