taikamya said:
I don't care what you care. I simply stated that I have regular discussions on the matter, some thing that you clearly doesn't. Also you insulting people speaks volume, literally, about you knowning "jackshit", which is what you know. You said yourself you don't know much about the situation, yet you call me ignorant. You said I was ignorant, yet you just didn' argue about what I said with any proof. Also you have a problem with reading, when I sad religion was the problem, I said IMHO in the beginning of the sentence, clearly you don't know what that means. I spread no hatred, my wife is religious and so am I. But I don't believe that a democracy that is heavily based on religion can be a free one. Again, destroyed. You go talk nonsense wherever you want, just know that you're wrong and spreading ignorance. |
Your opinion is wrong anyway.
"PSDB lost 4 elections straight and PSDB and PMDB are like family. A very stupid and aggressive family. PT is also a very stupid party, but PT made those awful alliances because they needed to, not because they wanted. PSDB did them outside elections, because they wanted it. They could have easily said "no"."
Intentions won't matter, I don't get your point.
"However, this is not a crime in Brazil. An impeachment in Brazil must be backed up by a responsability crime, which Rousseff did not commit according to Brazil laws."
The government used outside resources. That's a crime.
"Most of politicians in Brazil are extreme-right, or conservatives, because of this."
They're not.
"Makes no sense to me to say corruption is destroying the country and then put an even more corrupt government in there. One that nobody voted in"
Dilma and Temer had 51,64% of the votes. So yes, people went with Temer. An impeachment is a democratic process with is stated in the constitution.
