| SuaveSocialist said: Allowing people to review games is fair and just. Denying people the right to do so is not. Don't see how region is even a part of this equation. |
i dont see how you are calling yourself socialist if you dont see the unjust how none-western reviewers are left out from Metacritic. Arent you about equality?
| vivster said: You're talking here about metacritic's rules but it looks like you just made that rule up. That doesn't really strengthen your position. |
well they arent transparent in how this site is working, so i have to compare what i see. And i clearly see games not realsed in the US or West arent reviewed for the majority of games except this one
| cfin2987@gmail.com said: "Defame". Libel? If you are referring to defamation by publication in transient form then one of the main critiria is that the statement isn't true and that it is not simply an opinion i.e I think this game sucks. Therefore, no there is no defamation here. |
| pokoko said: Calling a bad game bad is an "agenda"? That was like reading a piece on how Kevin Bacon is behind the JFK assassination. |
game sucks according to these view Western reviewers who are at the forefront reviewing a game that wont even come out in their countries, while metacritic doesnt allow any none-western reviewers from Asia for a game only released in Asia.
Yep according to this dubious parameter the game sucks.
