By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation on 08 March 2016
Edit Thread
RexSad said:
Azzanation said:

You need to do some reading. If you think theres a big difference between the two games on how they got developed your kidding yourself.

http://www.windowscentral.com/square-enix-praises-microsoft-rise-tomb-raider

*Square-Enix stated previously that Microsoft are helping fund Rise of the Tomb Raider's development*

What difference does it make, both TR and SF were in bad postitions. You saying if it wasnt for Sony SFV wouldnt exist.. is the exact same thing in saying if it wasnt for MS, TR wouldnt exist. They both funded the projects and in TR's case, Sony didnt want a bar just like when MS didnt want a bar of SF. Both Square and Capcon wanted a company to help publish there game. First in first serve is exactly what happen.

There was always going to be another SF and TR game. Except you think Sony did no wrong with SF but MS did with TR. Thats the problem there. Infact Sony did worse becasue they completely moneyhatted the game to avoid other consoles where as MS didnt and still allow its competitors the game.

You give company money, they will give you exclusives.

 

 

LOL You really didn't read the article you posted. Nothing is said about Square getting financial help from MS and is about the PR BS claiming that MS believes in them and witht he partnership they can take the game to the next level. Whatever thatc rap means. The writer of the article suggests that MS is the reason the game exists, which is complete BS and he is making factless accuations of MS paying for the development.You made yourself look foolish with that article.

http://www.windowscentral.com/square-enix-praises-microsoft-rise-tomb-raider

Square-Enix stated previously that Microsoft are helping fund Rise of the Tomb Raider's development

 

http://www.gamereactor.eu/news/249214/Microsoft+helps+fund+Rise+of+the+Tomb+Raider/

Now he has told Kotaku more about how Microsoft will be involved in Rise of the Tomb Raider, and it turns out they are working with it in many ways, amongst them by funding the development.

Then Phil stated..

And we will definitely be spending money on developing the game - I want to make sure that it's as great as it can be

Still in denial?

These are not my words

 

I am questioning the arguments in this thread. First off. RoTR was going to have a sequel just like Street Fighter 5 was always going to exist. MS helped Fund RoTR to help it in development which Sony did the same for Capcom. They both helped to get there games completed to release on their platforms. Yes both came to PC afterwards however PC is not a console so for Console gamers RoTR released 1 year early for Xbox because MS spent money on it and SFV released on PS4 because Sony spent money on it. Those thinking SFV wasn’t going to happen without Sony are blind. Why should Sony benefit on RoTR sales when they didn’t spend a dime but MS did? That’s why it’s a year exclusive.