By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
m0ney said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

1. A better question would be where this myth comes from. People don't care much for Swedish culture, true, but they don't hate themselves.

But why did they allow their country taken over by insane politicians then? I can't see it happening in any other country. Germany is already done, lets not count it. In any other country, immigration policy like that would mean instant revolution. I can't get my head around it, how can civilians be attacked and raped on daily basis yet there's no uprisings. I know that nordics are less collective but there must be point where a nation takes control to defend itself but it seems that point is far exceeded, like there should be mass protests at least. When I read that refugee centers are being burned down by nationalists I calmed down a bit but then I read that there are 55 or so areas in Sweden now that are controlled by muslims where police does not enter anymore because they get attacked instantly. If it is true, are there any plans? That's why I asked about army, it's like invaders are right under their nose but nothing is happening.

I can say about my little country Latvia that nobody wants those 'refugees' here. There were some public persons on mass media speaking about how latvian WW2 refugees were taken in by other countries and how we should do the same now but after new year cologne none of them dare to open their mouths. Anytime there is an article about this topic 99% of comments are very negative and many less bright people express direct threats on immigrant lives. Does that happen in Sweden?

 

It all comes down to misguided benevolence. The media and government representatives tell our population that all other European countries, except Germany, are selfish and should be made to share our burden. Issues related to an excessively high immigration are "worth it", so to speak, because accepting all these people makes us the good guys.

Bolded: This used to be a thing years ago, when comments sections were still open. Most news sites support the establishment and won't let people comment anonymously, if at all, for the reasons that you mention. Which is unfortunate because the less bright individuals, as you call them, can only express themselves on websites criticizing the establishment since they still allow anonymous comments - which in turn gives readers the impression that only less bright individuals visit those websites.

Underlined: That's a disturbing thought. Burning down refugee camps won't solve any problems, which is confirmed even by key nationalist sympathizers who condemn such actions.