By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KungKras said:
barneystinson69 said:

Sure. Except for one fact, MOST SWEDISH MUSLUMS AREN'T SECOND GENERATION!!!! Do you realize that as ghetto's grow, integration will collapse? You'll see in 10-15 years. Islam will slowly take over Sweden. And as your women reproduce even less this generation, this process will speed up faster. Germany was finally smartening up and they closed their borders. But yours are wide open. But since you guys want this, choose your fate.

Also, I'd just like to know were exactly you got that 15% number. Thanks.

It's in demography section of the Islam in sweden wikipedia article. The same article also says that only about 25000 muslims are devout enough to even pray five times a day.

I simply disagree. There are tons of things we can do to keep ghettos from growing. Like spreading out new arrivals over the country as much as possible. Segregation needs to be fought hard against because it is a big problem.

Really? They will slowly start to take over how? Do you have any idea how long it would take for muslims to breed us out of existance even if 85% of every new generation didn't secularize? Conversion? Vitually non-existent. We've already shook off an as agressively proselytizing, immoral and controlling religion called christianity. And that religion had the advantage of holding our society in an iron grip for hundreds of years. And now you're telling me that another religion that forbids alcohol and bacon is gonna succeed where christianity failed? Not gonna happen.

What is going to happen is that we are going to be remembered by a lot of families as the place that took them in when they were escaping hell.It would be nice though if the US could stop messing up the middle east so these people didn't have to flee in the first place.

Not that I agree or disagree, because I personally haven't looked deeply into this particular topic, however, I would caution anyone from using Wikipedia as a sole source of information.  There are very serious issues w/ that site, and more specifically it's staff who quite often edit pages in a not so ethical manner.  I only use Wikipedia for the source articles listed at the bottom.  It sucks not being able to trust these sites, but...when you can clearly see bias, misinformation or mischaracterization being supported and defended by the sites admin...it's time to ensure you're double-checking all the claims being made.