Does anyone else thinks it sucks if there's a tie? All that means to me is that there's going to be a lot of compelling titles spread out on 3 different systems. I really don't want to spend $1250 on 3 consoles. My point is that because the prices for all the consoles are so high, many people aren't going to get a chance to buy multiple systems, at least not for many years. Last generation, for $500 I got a PS2 and GC at their respective launches. For that kind of money, I can't get any two systems. I think the lack of multiple console owners will hurt the 360/PS3 combined sales over a similar time frame as the last generation. That's one reason why I think the 360/PS3 are going to remain on the market for far longer than any other console except perhaps the NES. Too much has been invested in both systems to kill 'em off after 4 years or even 7 years like the XBOX and PS2, respectively. Plus, every new console generation causes everyone to lose way too much money. I don't think the industry can survive another self-destructive change in consoles.
My Top 5:
Shadow of the Colossus, Metal Gear Solid 3, Shenmue, Skies of Arcadia, Chrono Trigger
My 2 nex-gen systems: PS3 
and Wii 
Prediction Aug '08: We see the PSP2 released fall '09. Graphically, it's basically the same as the current system. UMD drive ditched and replaced by 4-8gb on board flash memory. Other upgrades: 2nd analog nub, touchscreen, blutooth, motion sensor. Design: Flip-style or slider. Size: Think Iphone. Cost: $199. Will be profitable on day 1.
