Tom Brady is clear, Suspension is lifted

[DivinePaladin]

mornelithe said:

DivinePaladin said:

It seems that the judge disagreed solely because of procedural errors, effectively the same thing as throwing out any criminal case because of illegally-submitted evidence. Yeah, that guy killed somebody, it's a fact, but the gun wasn't submitted into evidence properly so the jury can't rule him guilty. 

 

There are so many problems on both sides that this result is right now the best option for everybody. As much as I'd like to have seen Brady be suspended for his lack of cooperation with and active hindrance of the investigation (which an innocent man does not have reason to do), I'm fine with the result because the NFL did not follow procedure nearly well enough in a case of this caliber. 

 

And as an aside, if you want to be taken seriously on the topic, you should try to come off as knowledgeable without playing yourself up and others down. It's very doubtful you read EVERY piece of info about the case, especially since that amounts to at least 350 full pages of official documentation alone on top of thousands of articles and updates posted online since January. Because you seem to be biased one way here I even doubt you read the Wells Report in full, you probably did what everybody else did and skimmed key phrases quoted on Bleacher Report or something. And even if you HAD read everything, acting high and mighty about it, throwing in sassy responses, and then following up by making borderline hyperbolic claims just makes you seem like you're talking out of the wrong hole. I mean, not only is your South Park comment irrelevant to the topic, but saying that just makes you sound ridiculous, as if everything you say HAS to one up the guy before you. And if you wanna come off as credible or you want people to listen, that's not exactly a good way to do it. Just some friendly advice. 

It seems you read as little as Robert Downey Jr., that's ok.  I and many others have.  Including the Judge, who directly asked Pash if they had any evidence directly connecting Brady to it.  Which Nash said no, and fell back on text messages which, while are intriguing for the 2 employees, provide no actual evidence to suggest Brady wanted the balls anywhere but at 12.5.

Thanks for playing though :)

Hey, I made my point bud. I stopped reading up on the issue months ago when it was clear the NFL was just trying to profit off of the controversy, I'll fully admit that. But at least I'm honest about what I read. All you're doing at this point is coming off as immature with the constant "I totally read everything guys!" comments to make yourself seem more important than other commenters here. No adult who read literally everything is going to reiterate that point literally every time somebody disagrees.