JRPGfan said:
for Honor (castles and woods, and battlefields, swords and shields) The division (dead city with virus outbreak, and fps) Anno 2025 (space city building tatical game) Just dance game Rainbow six - seige (fps where you invade houses/buildings and gun down people) (looks very differnt from the division) Trackmania (raceing car game, not a sim, but more like mario kart is a racer) Assasins creed game (looks like non of the games above) Tomclansys ghost recon (okay this looks abit like some other shooter fps type games).
Im writeing this to point out how silly your post actually is. These games did not look like each other. |
Meh. Would have been funnier for me if one of the people that were ranting about Nintendo games looking the same and then show pictures of Xenoblade, Mario and Zelda had replied.
Obviously any monkey can see the difference between South Park and Assassin's Creed or Anno 2205. Miyamoto can to, which is why he said "A lot of games" instead of "all games" and was talking about the technicality and art direction instead of the differences in setting and assets. People here just jump on the stupid click-bait title of this thread that's inaccurate and then proceed to show two different realistic games where one is set in a forest and the other at the beach. Like no shit that's different. Soundwave's post a couple pages back is what Miyamoto is talking about and that is a stance I can only agree with. For the record though, For Honor only looked 'different' because you didn't have a gun (and that guy with his manic laugh that brought it as if it was the most epic thing ever), so a difference in setting and assets, if there would have been a car there it would have looked like any other car, and had I looked down a second I wouldn't have known which Tom Clancy game was which. I probably still wouldn't now if you showed me three random screens. But okay, same franchise.
