biglittlesps said:
Vodacixi said:
Ka-pi96 said:
Vodacixi said:
Ka-pi96 said:
PS4 has negatives, no wait 'major' negatives? Such as?
|
Such as having to pay for the online and poor and few exclusive titles.
|
Paying for online is standard, hardly a negative. There are plenty of brilliant exclusives for PS4, if you don't like them than that's your loss. But I can assure you there are plenty of people who do like them.
So these 'negatives' are only for you. To the majority of people they don't even exist...
|
Of course it's for me. Anyway, I don't give a shit if it's standard. If killing people became standard because whatever reason, would it be ok? Having to pay for the online is a pain in the ass, standard or not.
Moving to the exclusives... just no. It has some really mediocre new IPs... like Knack and The Order. And then some sequels that are vastly inferior to its predecessors like Killzone, Little Big Planet 3 or Infamous SS. I don't say they are bad, in fact they move between the "meh" and the "very good", but they're somehow disappointing and poor for the previous reasons. Bloodborne is the only thing that is actually brilliant. As for the others... just no.
And just in case you still don't get it: all of this is FOR ME. MY OPINION.
|
Gamers buy PS4 only for exclusives? 3rd party games are not games? Many people bought PS4 because its a all in one better gaming machine in price, performance and diverse library but not nintendo exclusive only machine like Wii U. Also games should not be great to play, good enough is needed to play and it can be great for some based on their likes.
|
When the heck did I say any of this?! My God...
They asked me why did I thought PS4 did not deserve to be this massive success. One of my personal reasons was the poor exclusive catalogue. The fact that Sony didn't even try to make amazing first party games. They have been lazy and I don't want laziness to be rewarded with maximum success. Multiplatform or third parties have nothing to do with this. But of course, some of you have the need of defend your platform, even if there is no need to do it.
