JazzB1987 said:
Guess why I stopped replying to you in the other thread? Becaue you clearly lack the ability to read and understand text at least when it comes to what I write. (never care much about your reply to others so I dont know if that phenomenom is exclusive to me or not)
You disgreed with something I never said. So actually wasted both your and my time.
And you do it again now lol and use my "super obvious oversimplification" of shaders as an argument against me wow. Want some kind of Nobel Prize for that now?
Seriously replying with something like "You definition of shaders show that you don't know how a graphics pipeline work." to a sentence like " which are little tricks that make ugly things appear less ugly" shows me that you always nitpick some nonsense and write a f*ing 10000 page essay on that subject but the main points I say you dont even disagree with lol. Like shaders make things look better than they are. They can add the illusion of more detail by making things appear more detailed even tho the detail is just on the "texture"(please dont write another 100000 word essay on what a texture is for gods sake) and non-existant in form of polygons.
I never mentioned Ryse nor The Order so why even mention them? (I also never said that YOU talked about Metro 2033 I just used it as example of how blocky the game is. Yet you AGAIN twist it so that it looks I made a mistake lol)
You said "ITS METRO LAST LIGHT NOT METRO 2033".
So you have some "point" that helps your argument? Actually reading what people say would help you much more especially because you would not waste our time so much.
And NO its NOT about Metro Last Light because I want to talk about Metro 2033. I dont care if you mention Last Light.
I also talked about Crysis and then you mentioned Metro Last Light. How would you like it if I now say "No its not about Metro Last Light its about Crysis"? Stop cherrypicking already.
Do us a favor and stop replying to what I say as long as you dont even want to read the text or try to understand. Thank you
|
It's amazing that you actually wrote a reply to my post with this size and basically didn't had a counter argument to anything I wrote and just claimed that your entire post "didn't mean what was wrote on it". It doesn't make a lot of sense, does it? Just this:
"Like shaders make things look better than they are. They can add the illusion of more detail by making things appear more detailed even tho the detail is just on the "texture"
Show that you don't have a clue about how a game works. Modern GPUs are based on shaders. Remove shaders and you will end up with polygons with textures slapped on it. No light, no shadows, nothing. They aren't a "detail", they are pretty much one of the main actors here.
What your posts show to me and everyone is that you love do discuss technical matters that you don't understand, trying to fit things to your agenda and just gets mad when anyone points you lack of basic knowledge about the topic. Despite that, I didn't disagreed with something you didn't said. You claimed that Crysis 1 looks better than Crysis 3 because it is "more complex in geometry" and that Crysis 2/3 have only some "illusory" shaders. I said that Crysis 3 looks better than 2 that looks better than 1, and posted a reasonable argument for that. You don't have anything to counter so you just get mad. Keep you arguments limited to topics that you actually have the knowledge to discuss.
