By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
aLkaLiNE said:
dane007 said:


But its so cheap . If a gamer cannot afford live , then they technically can't afford to be gamer. Its like 5 pe rmonth . Thats like 20 cents per day for 30 day lol. I  am sure the people who are complain can afford to leave aside 20 cents.


It's not about the price. It's just annoying that they force you to pay.  Just because I can afford to pay for something doesn't mean I want to, especially if it feels like it should be free. Stop kidding yourself by pretending like you're ballin on a $60 budget kiddo, anyone who shells out $4-500 on a console can easily afford $60 a year on games/subscriptions.

YOu have to remember that pc has thigns like origin and the very popular steam. If they put a pricewall, it will fail to seam. They have tried with windows gaming and it failed. Whereas with consoles, it was thanks to ms with xbox as it was teh first one to come out with xbox live paywall and proved to be successful. Look at sony, the y followed the footsteps of ms hence why psn is now under the paywall. Two different ecosystem. Thats my point, hence why gamers shoulnt complain. Conosles never had an ecosytem from the start that was like steam. If they had, we would be a different conversation. There are benefits for paying and one of the benefits is more servers, the oney they make can used to get more games and what not.  When ps3 was free, the multiplayer was horrible compared to xbox live with teh 360.