By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DigitalDevilSummoner on 31 January 2015
Edit Thread
sc94597 said:
Intrinsic said:

And its thinking like that that's got Nintendo in the hole they are in today.

A lot of good Nintendo fans have done for the WiiU so far, if I were Nintendo u would be doing everything I can to get as much eyes on my products as possible.

My point was that PewDiePie does not advertise Nintendo products. He's scared that the companies whom he does advertise products for will follow suit. He has no interest in Nintendo products.

Following the suit of a missleading OP, you are -intentionally ?- wrong.

He DOES Nintendo games, he just doesn't have to. Just like he doesn't have to play the game of ANY company that follows Nintendo's tactic:

PewDiePie said:

And finally, when there’s just so many games out there to play. Nintendo games just went to the bottom of that list. Even if more publishers starts implementing this idea of sharing revenue. Then fine, there’s always going to be plenty of games out there, ready to become the next “Mienkraft” - Sounds cheesy, but it’s true.

So, you should reconsider this decision Nintendo. (◕‿◕✿)

Added note: I’ll still play Nintendo games that I want to play on my channel as usual. I’m lucky to be in a situation where losing ad revenue on a few videos wont matter. However, many people on YouTube are not in that situation.

Everyone loses in this scenario that Nintendo has created, that’s why I’m against it.

 

Yep, that is tha man PISSED at nintendo, raging and ranting with furry.

Slicey said:
Somebody explain to me why music, sports, movies, tv shows and information from behind a paywall don't allow this but games should because of "the free advertising"? Wouldn't all the other companies allow this if it was such a boon?

 

Passive entertainment / interactive entertainment. Everyone watches the same movie, the movie will be the same for everyone. But every gamer's experience with a game will be different.