Edit: Anita Sarkeesian is not helping with the development of Mirrors Edge; Rejoice!

[TRAVIS!!!]

fireburn95 said:

brighat said:
Some people take their hobby way too seriously.

I don't know who this woman is and don't care. She doesn't affect my life. She seemingly affects the lives of some for her actions for some reason.

Do you like games? Yes?

Then this probably will affect you one day, when the quality of games reduces because of her agenda to make games more inclusive to women.

1) Easier controls (apparently for women)
2) Forced female leads (even if it doesnt make sense in the story)
3) Females represented non-sexually (Yeah because there aren't any prostitutes in the real world, and some women actually like to dress nice)

Also, this specific petition affects women, since she claims to speaks for women when she makes decisions to make games easier, and invoke a female-specific response.

But it affects the quality of games we love, for all.

Do you really, honestly think games that are more inclusive to women are automatically of less quality?

1. I like to think easier controls are better than complicated controls, generally speaking.

2. I'm sure there are lots of developers who wanted to make games with female leads, but were forced to go with male leads instead because of the way things currently are.

3. Feminism doesn't mean women can't dress nice or look sexy.

This was probably my last post, regardless of how you might reply to that, so goodbye.