Destiny and the flaws in game reviewing systems.

[Shoestar]

aikohualda said:
if it doesn't go your way... it is flawed... someone will be a future CEO

It's not a question of going my way or not. I do not think for example that Destiny should be given a 10/10 either(Just like a few other games which I won't mention so as not to attract the ire of the internet). I'm only pointing out that the reviewing system is flawed due to the fact that the ratings are given on elements which are irrelevant to gaming such as:

1. Reputation of the company making the game

2. Publisher

3. Budget

4. What the reviewer wants the game to be as opposed to what the game is and what the target audience for the game expects it to be.

 

Of course, I may have failed to mention it before but not all the reviews are horrid and useless. Some field out valid points with regards to the lacunas of the game and give scores which reflect the logic of the arguements. But arguements such as "$500m budget for this game", which already reflects badly due to the poorly researched nature of this arguement goes to show that those reviews are just flawed.

Maybe the reviews ought to be more scientific with an adequate methodology and analysis section.... FYI, I'm already a CEO (Not of a powerful multinational however).