Headshot said:
PullusPardus said:
the first uncharted looked okay back then
Uncharted 2 looked the best
Uncharted 3 looks like crap compared (it was rushed, but people don't want to admit it)
Last Of Us looks a bit better than Uncharted 2 during cutscenes but was very lacking during gameplay
Yeah I agree Naughty Dog is very overrated and they use really shameful techniques to fool people (make games extremely linear, removing anti aliasing for better textures...etc) the way they handled Uncharted 3 was really really poor but people just ignored it for a while and then after the hype went down realized how rushed it was (even the story was shit), on the other hand we have Guerilla Games for example that actually do amazing things in terms of graphics with what they're limited too.
However the big difference between the two is one makes a first person shooter with the most generic characters possible, and the other makes actual memorable characters, honestly the best thing about Killzone is the lore and the villians , the main characters are just so.... generic, and the story other than the first one are so so bad.
|
Uncharted 2 and TLOU really look great though and naughty dog did a great job at getting the most out of the ps3. You could argue that many developers use techniques to fool people like epic and guerilla who seemingly didn't realise there was more colours than brown and grey until gears 3 and killzone shadowfall although gears 3 and Killzone SF do look great. The question is if naughty dog can continue to set the bar in terms of graphics moving away from the complexity of developing for the ps3 which many third parties just didn't have the time or patience to master with the 360 there.
|
Yes, but it will also force them to make more these techniques in favor of not getting a backlash from people who hype their games for their graphics.
meaning more cutscenes and less interactivity, its the same happening for FFXV by the way.
